How can we start the task of interpretation (fundamental in the confessor/confessant role of the theologian) if it is not going to depart from the dyadic references, fatally bound to family formation based on two opposite sexes and desires? Moreover, desire in Queer Theology needs to give a place to located desire, that is, pleasure. Queer Theology is a materialist theology that takes bodies seriously. — Marcella Althaus-Reid in The Queer God
  1. thealogian reblogged this from malakhgabriel
  2. meshugenahqueen reblogged this from saving-sergius
  3. saving-sergius reblogged this from malakhgabriel
  4. malakhgabriel posted this
Short URL for this post: